Saturday, April 8, 2017
"...There's Just Never A Voice Of Reason Around When You Need One..."
I just finished doing a week of guest hosting on talk radio.
At some point, a couple of days in, as memory serves, after a predictable number of callers offered up a predictable amount of venom sprinkled with occasional splash of vicious, I was reminded of something I had forgotten.
Why we have speed limit signs.
Stay tuned for that.
A Riverside, California woman and her three friends made a two-hour drive in harrowing winter weather for a weekend trip to Big Bear, only to find once she arrived the group would be denied shelter because of her race.
An Airbnb host in Running Springs told Dyne Suh she was canceling the booking Suh had made because she is Asian.
“I wouldn’t rent to you if you were the last person on Earth,” the host told Suh. “One word says it all. Asian.”
Suh said the host had originally confirmed via text message she could pay extra to add two people to the reservation, which had only included two individuals. When she followed up once they were near the cabin to double check, Suh said, the racist tirade ensued.
“If you think four people and two dogs ate (sic) getting a room fir (sic) $50 a night on Big Bear mountain during the busiest weekend of the year… You are insanely high,” the host told her, calling her a con artist.
When Suh said she would report the action to Airbnb officials, the host replied: “It’s why we have Trump.”
“For me personally, to now have someone say something racist to me and say it’s because of Trump, it was my fears coming true,” Suh said. “That people who held these racist beliefs felt emboldened.”
The host went on to say she would “not allow this country to be told what to do by foreigners.”
Suh is an American citizen who has called the U.S. home since she was 3 years old.
“If this is my experience as a light-skinned Asian woman, what is it like for people who have darker skin than me or are Muslim?” Suh wondered aloud. “What is it like for people who are undocumented or not U.S. citizens yet?
Because Airbnb provided the group with a reimbursement that night, they were able to find alternate lodging, Suh said on Facebook.
A spokesman for the company said it investigated the incident and the host has been barred from its service.
"Airbnb does not condone discrimination in any way,” spokesman Christopher Nulty said. “We have worked to provide the guest with our full support. In line with our non-discrimination policy, this host has been permanently removed from the Airbnb platform."
First, let's just cut to one of the obvious chases here.
Bigotry, like pollen in the springtime and long lines at the "express" checkout, ain't nothin' new. Since there has been mankind, there has been man unkind and no race, creed, culture or political affiliation has ever had a corner on the discrimination thing.
Well, actually, Nazi Germany is probably a champ that retired undefeated, but allusions to brown shirts and goose stepping do little but distract a lot of Trump supporters from whatever point is being made by the allusion.
So, let's not go there.
The thing about Dyne Suh's experience isn't that it's particularly unique, although that's not meant to imply that it's to be treated with complacency or apathy....the thing about her experience is that it illustrates a point that doesn't seem to make its way into the conversation these days.
In fact, most especially these days. If, like sands through the hourglass, these are the days of our lives then, bet the farm, Maggie, like kidney stones through the urethra, these are the days of Trump.
Which brings us back around to speed limit signs.
And why we have them.
Because we have morons.
Oh, not you, of course. Or me.
I'm talking about them.
Them who would go a hundred miles an hour in the fifty five miles per hour zone instead of eighty miles an hour in the fifty five miles per hour zone if there were no sign there telling them that they need to be going only fifty five miles per hour.
Locks, an old proverb explains, are for honest people. The logic at work, of course, being that burglars (ie; dishonest people) can break locks. The locks, meanwhile, give the impression of security and keep the honest people honest.
Speed limits, or any limit on anything, actually, are more of an inverse to that principle.
Reasonably intelligent, compassionate people with a care for much and many more in the world beyond themselves drive at a reasonable and reasonably intelligent speed because they are reasonable.
Not because there's a sign telling them they have to do so.
The intelligence challenged in our lives tend to keep that speedometer registering somewhere between "fuck you, here I come" and "I may or may not successfully negotiate this next curve and may or may not end my life, and possibly, your own in the lesser known yoga position, 'idiot wrapped flamingly around tree'...".
Meanwhile, bigots, like their speed demon relatives, are likely to likewise drive full speed, and spew, ahead unless governed by some sense that their behavior will result in admonishment or even punishment.
And while the response from the Airbnb folks was certainly appropriate and laudable, we of the non-bigot demographic are pretty sure that losing favored status in the bed and breakfast category isn't going to put much of a dent in the mindset of that host with a hard on for hatred.
What's required here is a heavy duty intervention on injustice and intolerance, perhaps a stern admonishment from a respected leader of the community or even a condemnation of such attitudes and actions by the leader of this great nation, the role model we've all chosen to exemplify the very best of our better angels, who is ready, willing and able to speak out forcefully and articulately on the pitfalls of prejudice, the demonology of discrimination, the simple, basic truth that in this country, all men, and women, are created equal.....and......
oh....wait......
...yeah....uh...that's not gonna happen.
And the bigots know that.
"They ain't no speed limit signs around here. Git it?"
"And ain't nobody gonna tell me that I gotta put up with your slanty-eyed bullshit".
That's why we got Trump.
Saturday, April 1, 2017
"...Even Public Service Has A Shelf Life..."
You don't usually think of The Kinks when you think of presidential politics.
But among the more successful titles of the British pop band's offerings to the pop charts in the mid to late 1960's, "You Really Got Me", "Tired Of Waiting" and "All Day And All Of The Night", there is one moderate hit that practically cries out to be part of the electoral process.
"Who'll Be The Next In Line".
Enter Hillary Clinton.
Or, of course, to be more precise and avoid any accusations of fake news, re-enter Hillary Clinton.
For analysis and perspective on the reemergence of the Susan Lucci of American politics, we turn today to three seemingly unconnected individuals from three different vocations and/or walks of life who, as it will turn out, make up the perfect trifecta when it comes to talking 2020.
Timothy Stanley. William Edward Hickson. Carole King.
Stanley is an historian and columnist for Britain's Daily Telegraph. He weighed in, somewhat disapprovingly, online this weekend on the "return of Hillary."
Hillary Clinton is back.
Of course, Hillary Clinton is back. I am convinced she will run for the
presidency as many times as it takes to win -- even if she is still being
wheeled through the streets of Iowa at 108, kept alive by robotics and a
refusal to surrender.
She came to Georgetown University on Friday to give a speech
to some fans, and delivered a stinging attack on Donald Trump's budget. Clinton
is great at attacking others, dreadful at selling herself. This is a
presidential candidate who was beaten first by a man who they said couldn't win
-- because he was black -- and then by a man who they said shouldn't win --
because he was Donald Trump.
And even though the shock of Trump's
election victory is receding as we become more involved in just how bad he is
at governing, for Clinton it will never ebb as the most stunning rebuke
possible. Hillary Clinton was beaten by Donald J Trump. That is like losing the
Oscar for best picture to "Police Academy VI." After that kind of
humiliation, most people would quit politics and go live in a cabin. Not
Hillary. She still needs us to remember who she is.
This is typical of politicians. To
succeed in this game you need to be sensitive enough to need to be loved but
shallow enough to weather the hate. Trump is an extreme version of this. He
appears to feel criticism deeply and yet he also invites it. Perhaps it's
better to be talked about horribly than not at all.
A few presidents and presidential
candidates have walked away from the office into the sunset, but most try to
find a second life. Nixon was rarely out of the public eye. Bill Clinton
started a foundation and amassed a fortune in speaker's fees. Bob Dole did an ad for Viagra.
And, really, what's wrong with this?
Like Hillary, these statesmen all have experience to share, wisdom to impart.
As the country sails into uncertain waters under Captain Trump, doesn't it make
sense to stop and listen to the views of Hillary Clinton -- an intellectually
gifted former secretary of state, no less?
No. In this instance, no. And the
reason is quite simply that it's too soon. Too soon since Hillary Clinton lost
the election and gave the White House to Trump -- because, regardless of what
strengths Trump might have had, 2016 was ultimately an election for the
Democrats to lose.
I have no doubt that almost any
other candidate could have beaten Trump. Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Alec
Baldwin, Big Bird. It turns out that the one candidate who could lose was
Hillary.
Yet she insisted on running.
Insisted that the party machine back her. Insisted on mounting a grimly negative campaign against
her opponent that most probably backfired. Now she has reportedly signed back on with the
speaker's bureau that handled her richly compensated appearances
before the election. My question is: Why would anyone pay to see a speech given
by her?! It would be as perverse as paying Trump to give a lecture on
university governance.
There is a post-politics role for
Clinton, but it cannot be just yet. Her party needs a period in which to
separate from her memory -- to rebuild, find new candidates, reestablish its
identity and delink itself from the entire Clinton philosophy.
She might go the route of
championing clean politics or could pick up the mantle of class war, for it can't be long before Trump's voters notice
that his proposed tax cuts are so generous to the rich. Whatever the Democrats
look like in the future, Hillary Clinton cannot be permitted to capture the
conversation and distract the press. America needs to move on. She needs to
pause and reflect.
Whatever else, Timothy has to offer up on the subject in the future, my personal envy will always be bestowed in his direction as the man who offered that being beaten by Donald J. Trump was like "losing the Oscar for Best Picture to Police Academy VI."
Yeah. What he said.
Meanwhile, we ponder the perspective of Mr. Hickson.
William Edward Hickson was a British educational writer who lived from the early until the late 1800's. And although both writers Thomas Palmer and Frederick Marryat included the familiar words in their writings, it was Hickson who is traditionally given credit for popularizing, as it were, the proverb which we all learn, and learn to live with, from our earliest recollections.
If, at first, you don't succeed / try, try again.
I'm not entirely on board with Tim Stanley's witty contention that Hillary will eventually evolve from Stronger Together to I, Robot, but the point is well made and certainly taken. Loath as I often am to fall back on anything Dr. Phil has to offer up, I am a subscriber to his little bumper sticker theory that "the best indicator of future behavior is past behavior". And Hillary's past behavior pretty much guarantees she is a faithful, and zealous, follower of Mr. Hickson's program, proverbially speaking, of course.
And while I readily admit, and am on every public record there is to be on, that I'm open to voting for just about anybody who isn't Trump (with the exception of, say, Sarah Palin, because even a libtard snowflake like me knows that a demagogue is still preferable to a doorknob), I'm not only in line with what Stanley preaches about Hillary being a distraction and not a distinction, I'm more than full of the sense that Tim didn't take it quite far enough.
Sure, there's something to be said for those who show the pluck and moxy to get up off the mat and get back on the horse, metaphors most obviously mixed. And you can hate Hillary all you want and/or need but no one is ever gonna make the case stick that she lacks pluck and moxy.
But there comes a time when the process has to move from Hickson to Einstein. And from "if at first you don't succeed' to "insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result each time."
Allowing for whatever positive contributions to American history in her, and our, time that Hillary has made, she does no service to anything or anyone with any attempt to return to the head of the line. Those who hate her are not going away anytime soon. Pretty sure bet they're not even going away in her lifetime (again, this assumes that she hasn't figured out a way to make her eternal candidacy the fourth law of robotics.)
And because she is such a polarizing figure, her presence in the process serves only to dilute and weaken any fresh, new formula that seems clearly needed to appeal to the tastes of the American electorate. At least that part of the electorate that wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton if she handed out fifty yard line tickets to the Super Bowl with each ballot cast in her favor.
To everything there is a season. Every dog has his day. You only go round once. Pick your slogan, motto or catchphrase, the handwriting on the wall couldn't be any more readable if it had been put there with a Sharpie even Chris Christie couldn't get his hands around.
The greatest of the comedians in our history all share, at least, one skill. They know when the time is right to get off the stage. It seems not just a little amusingly ironic that a career politician should have the same skills as a career comic. Hard to see the line between the two occupations so much of the time and all that.
And of all the perilously close to cliche three word phrases that so often find their way into the political monologue/dialogue, "we, the people", "time for change", "the American people", even the simple, basic "vote for me", there is no three worder with more sincerity per syllable than this:
Timing is everything.
The lyric to the iconic love song tells us "the world will always welcome lovers / as time goes by"
It says nothing about welcoming either repeat customers or repeat offenders.
Tim Stanley writes that Hillary Clinton's reemergence, and potential return, is inappropriate because, in his words, "...it's too soon."
Due respect, Tim, I beg to differ. And by way explaining why, let me turn it over to someone who says it best.
Carole King.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)